Bard AI Is Boring: Google Explains Why They Want It That Way | WSJ
In a world filled with constant innovation, it’s easy to get caught up in the race to be first. But sometimes, being first isn’t everything. In fact, Google is making a case for why boring is better when it comes to artificial intelligence.
In a recent article from the Wall Street Journal, Google breaks down its approach to AI and why it’s different from other companies. For Google, its focus is on “applied AI.” This means that the company is more interested in creating AI that can be immediately put to use, as opposed to developing new and flashy features.
Some may see this as a more conservative approach, but Google believes that it’s the best way to create AI that will actually be helpful to people. After all, what good is an impressive AI demo if it can’t be used in the real world?
One example of this is Google’s ChatGPT. While other chatbots might try to impress you with their witty banter, ChatGPT is designed to be a more helpful assistant. It can answer your questions, provide information, and even book appointments.
So why is this approach better? For one, it ensures that Google’s AI is actually useful. But secondly, it also means that the company’s AI is less likely to get into trouble.
Google’s AI has been in the news for all the wrong reasons in recent years. From spreading fake news to making racist comments, it’s clear that AI can sometimes be a liability. By keeping its AI focused on practical applications, Google is hoping to avoid these kinds of problems.
Of course, this approach isn’t without its drawbacks. One of the biggest is that it can be difficult to get people excited about Google’s AI offerings. After all, they’re not as flashy as what some of its competitors are doing.
But at the end of the day, boring might just be the best way to get people to actually use AI. And that’s something that everyone can get behind.
